I often wonder about Steve Wozniak’s claim that the first computers were built to help “common people rise.” Correlating the evolution of software with the upheaval of our human society brings a very hopeful sentiment. Now, software engineering methodologies cater to more nuanced requirements of our “rising,” such as allowing space to correct mistakes (agility) and openness to feedback (adaptability).
In my opinion, one of the most important steps in this direction is test-driven development (TDD), which allows our developers a human aspect of their nature, i.e., we are bound to make flaws. TDD enables us to write our tests before the actual coding starts. This makes our software development more experience-oriented than output-driven.
Test-driven development is an approach to software development that mandates first writing test codes to capture the software's expected behavior and then guiding the development process accordingly. In TDD, the test cases are written before the actual development, and the subsequent code is written to pass those tests successfully.
The shift towards agile and a need for faster feedback loops are the prime reasons behind the vast appeal of TDD across businesses.
Core Principles of TDD Cycle
The idea of writing tests before even writing the code might sound bizarre initially, but the TDD cycle makes it possible. The core principles of TDD offer a systematic and cyclic process to ensure faster development without compromising functionality. Let me break down the principles of what is called the red-green-refactor cycle.
Red: The most popular principle states that you should write a test bound to fail because no code has been written yet. This test is written based on the expected functionalities of the software.
Green: The next principle suggests writing code that fails the first test. The idea is to write enough code that functions as per the requirement just by making the simplest change. This would make coding faster and more quality-oriented.
Refactor: This principle suggests making the simplest changes in the code that would allow it to pass the test cases. This way, any failed code would take the minimum possible time to fix, thus reducing the overall time to market for the code.
Following these principles allows an iterative development process, essentially the core of test-driven development. In addition to this, TDD also works on principles as below:
Incremental development: Encouraging iterative coding with minor improvements at each increment to ensure uncompromised functionality within a minimal time frame.
Maximum test coverage: This principle mandates that every functional aspect be tested thoroughly with the required test cases.
Test automation: The essential principle that ensures integration with automation tools for faster testing and quality assurance in the CI/CD pipelines.
TDD vs. Traditional Testing
The main difference between traditional testing and how it’s done during TDD is the positioning of test-case development. In TDD, you write the test before the development starts, which has never been the case, even for continuous testing. This key distinction brings other differences between the two.
Test-driven Development
Traditional Testing
The motive here is to write tests that guide the development.
Testing here is guided by the development process.
It initially slows down the development process but ensures faster cycles in the long term.
Testing methods like shift-left and continuous testing make the process faster initially, but the time-to-market is slower in the long term.
The code design is essentially more modular as it is carried on as per the testing.
No such mandate here. The modularity can vary as per other factors.
Feedback is continuous and immediate.
Feedback is delayed and usually comes after a full dev cycle./td>
Benefits of Test-Driven Development
The value offered by test-driven development resides in its inherent proactiveness in testing. Here’s how this proactive nature of TDD brings benefits to software development:
Better Coding: TDD helps as a “blinder” in the development process where the developers are necessarily focused on functional requirements. This makes the overall development process cleaner while allowing developers the modular approach they need. Moreover, the iterative development offered by TDD makes the code more defect-free, further smoothening the CI/CD pipeline.
Maintainable Code: With the test cases written before coding, any bugs in the code are easily detected, and any failures in recent updates are quickly isolated. This offers the true benefits of iterative development, where code becomes more maintainable in the long term.
Speedy development: As discussed earlier, TDD initially demands some time investment. However, once the debugging and refactoring efforts find their flow, the overall development process is much faster. Moreover, with a resourceful development process, the team also finds more efficiency in collaboration and communication, making the process even faster and more adaptive to change.
Continuous Improvement: Of course, with the kind of adaptability that TDD offers, code can be iteratively improved without hindrance. With easier refactoring and mindful code evolution, the codebase can also easily accommodate new technologies and patterns if required.
Five steps of implementing test-driven development in Your Organization
Step 1: Mindset Shift
Before getting into any TDD, the organization leaders must educate their team on its benefits, technical resources, and practices so that they can consciously prepare themselves for the shift. Training on TDD-based tools like JUnit, Pytest, and more will also help understand the process on practical grounds.
Step 2: Pilot Project
It is recommended that the pilot project of TDD is more manageable so that the entire process seems manageable to the teams. A small pilot project would also help build confidence. The best way to do this is by choosing a relatively simple feature in your project and implementing TDD around it before moving on to the entire project.
Step 3: Red-Green-Refactor
Once, a feature or a small project is identified for implementation, you can apply the red-green-refactor cycle to write test cases, write code, an clean up the code respectively in that order.
Step 4: CI/CD Integration
Once the different teams have well-adapted the workflows for TDD, we can take the next step to integrate it into our DevOps machinery. Tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, and more can help here by running tests on every pull requirement or code commit.
Step 5: Continuous Improvement
Not only the codebase needs to improve continuously, but also the test suite. Regularly reviewing the test suites to eliminate any wasteful test cases or redundant tests will ensure lean and faster testing.
How TDD fits into modern agile and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines
Let’s face it - concerns about CI/CD integration in modern pipelines are essentially concerns about automation and agility. TDD fits well with both. For agility, it offers an iterative cycle of testing and feedback to make the codebase more efficient and functional.
Automation, on the other hand, is taken care of by automated testing tools that can help write test cases that would thoroughly test each code change right from the beginning. Therefore, any DevOps team can blindly trust TDD for its agility and automation-friendliness with the CI/CD pipelines.
Common Challenges in TDD and How to Overcome Them
The primary challenge for TDD comes from its very gift of maintaining modularity. Too much modularity makes the code too complex for TDD test cases to cover. Here are the challenges it manifests because of that.
Test Coverage: By it’s their very nature, the test cases written for TDD are more affable to unit testing than any other type of testing. This makes it difficult to test for every type of test scenario, especially relating to performance and user experience.
More Time Investment: As discussed above, TDD needs a lot of time investment during the initial days of its implementation. Developers might take time to write test which would add more time to that invested for coding, leading to slower development.
Challenging Adaption: The mindset shift required for accepting TDD in the work-culture might be difficult especially as the DevOps teams grow. Moreover, if the development environments are poorly defined, TDD can offer more challenges than solutions to the CI/CD pipelines.
Integration with AI: The outputs in AI are more behavior-oriented and probabilistic. This is a difficulty for pre-writing the test cases before the development begins as the scope for output gets more vast and complicated.
TDD frameworks and tools
JUnit
Popular for unit testing
Supports test case generation before coding
Support for repeatable tests
Selenium
Automated testing
Good option for functional testing in TDD
Mockito
Mocking framework
Java-based
Isolated testing for individual components
PyUnit
Python-based
Support for assertions in TDD
TestCafe
Javascript Testing
End-to-end testing in Web Apps
Automation in TDD
Jest
Popular for Typescript
Mocking framework
Ideal for both frontend and backend testing in TDD
Best Practices for Effective TDD
Write small tests that don’t focus on more than a single functionality at a time.
Follow the red-green-refactor principle.
Write tests more from a behavioral perspective than technical ones.
Aim for critical paths and high test coverage
Don’t ignore edge cases. Prioritize them if you have to.
The Future of Test-Driven Development
Future of TDD is the future of development itself. As development is headed towards integration with new technologies, better security measures, and improved monitoring resources, so is TDD. More sooner than later, businesses will be
Integration With AI: TDD could be augmented by AI-driven tools that not only write code but also generate test cases, making the process even more seamless.
Greater emphasis on observability: TDD could evolve to incorporate more real-time, production-level feedback, helping bridge the gap between isolated unit tests and full-system observability.
DevSecOps: With security becoming integrated earlier in the development pipeline (as in DevSecOps), TDD might expand to include more security-focused tests upfront.
Conclusion
I don’t think there will ever be a drive stronger than helping common people rise. Our attempts to achieve automation, agility, scalability, etc., in our software products, might seem business-oriented but have very human needs beneath them. Test-driven development, too, is a result of such needs. Building test cases before development even begins opens up so many possibilities for software solutions in terms of quality assurance and catering to complex industry use cases.
Conclusion
Have a specific concern bothering you?
Try our complimentary 2-week POV engagement
Our Latest Blogs
How AIOps is Transforming the Future of IT Operations?
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)